recently, talking about movies with some friends, went out often for "remake".
Every time I think about this "way" of making a film makes me sad and angry I am at the same time:
- I am sad because I think that if they do remake it means that many have no original ideas.
- I am upset, because very often, but not always, ruin the original film, or will not make the cut.
Example: " Planet of the Apes "in 2001, according to many is not on par with the original '68.
Now, those who defend the remakes often utter the phrase" the remake serves to spread among a new generation old films that otherwise would not go to know ".
This statement is not false, it is quite false, because the remake is not giving publicity to the original work but replaces it.
Example:" The Ring "the majority among people without either ignores or, even if he is aware, has never seen the original film.
What sense does it make a remake? I can understand if the film is not a great thing, but if the film is a masterpiece, so why should do it again?
would be like watching "Birth of Venus" by Botticelli and say "maybe I can do better, even now refer back."
If you really want to know the masterpieces of the cinema to new talents, so why not send more on television, instead of the usual movies and shit, why do not you propose the original version, the real version.
We live in the Internet age, it should be easier to get a classic right?
However, I did not write this blog by chance, the fact is that it should go, no one knows when another the remake of a masterpiece of Italian horror "Suspiria" Silver, of course American.
Now, it is rare to see an Italian film is a masterpiece, especially looking at what is coming in the last 20 years of Cinecitta, the few we have, and that all belong to the past, teniamoceli close.
By Ivo
From Hell
0 comments:
Post a Comment